Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SARACENA

IMO: 9334325
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 11,566 t
Port of registry: Ravenna
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,566 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.5 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+156%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,448 t

CO₂ emitted

7,747 t

7,867 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,865 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,977 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.5 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−42%)

76.1Ranks 155 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.7 (+3%)

8.0Faster than 60% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+156%)

4.51Ranks 1,404 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports51%
From the EU8%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU10%

80% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,215 t).

Fuel burned laden

68%

32% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SARACENA
Oil tanker median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SARACENA
Oil tanker median

0.02.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SARACENA
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−9%	−3%	+14%	−34%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−5%	−0%	+234%	−5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	−63%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+0%	+14%	−38%	+102%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−27%	−23%	+22%	−48%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+2%	+69%	+17%	+6%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.4 kn	−51%	+59%	+20%	−53%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	2,448	7,747	32,865	2,977	11.0	74.5	20.38	68%
2024	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	2,365	7,456	28,939	2,797	10.3	81.7	31.08	56%
2023	not published	743	2,337	8,656	874	9.9	85.8	32.85	–
2022	not published	2,000	6,311	23,697	2,353	10.1	84.4	29.49	–
2021	not published	3,210	10,144	38,194	4,297	8.9	84.0	14.61	–
2020	not published	3,603	11,504	31,341	3,734	8.4	115.0	28.08	–
2019	not published	3,045	9,732	26,896	5,341	5.0	113.2	26.51	–
2018	not published	5,138	16,204	22,404	14,300	1.6	229.3	56.35	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	20.38	7.95	+156%	1,404 of 1,665	ABS	A+B
2024	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	31.08	8.06	+286%	1,665 of 1,787	ABS	–
2023	not published	32.85	8.44	+289%	1,677 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	29.49	8.51	+247%	1,818 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	14.61	8.86	+65%	1,352 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	28.08	9.03	+211%	1,709 of 1,870	RINA	–
2019	not published	26.51	8.83	+200%	1,744 of 1,919	RINA	–
2018	not published	56.35	8.86	+536%	1,742 of 1,779	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.