Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MTM DUBLIN

IMO: 9335824
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 28,067 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEMBULK MINNEAPOLIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd · part of MTM Ship Management

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,067 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

80.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (−46%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

679 t

CO₂ emitted

2,119 t

2,153 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,391 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

908 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 80.9 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+0%)

53.8Ranks 640 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 11.0 (−16%)

8.7Faster than 15% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (−46%)

8.47Ranks 172 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU83%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU5%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,108 t).

Fuel burned laden

96%

5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MTM DUBLIN
Chemical tanker median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MTM DUBLIN
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MTM DUBLIN
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−0%	−17%	−54%	−13%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−17%	+4%	+24%	−4%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+12%	+10%	+4%	−64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−64%	−63%	+639%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 64%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+136%	+97%	−93%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 136%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	+2%	+25%	+169%	+2%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	679	2,119	8,391	908	9.2	80.9	9.00	96%
2023	not published	1,496	4,687	18,410	1,668	11.0	81.3	10.29	98%
2022	not published	1,458	4,560	14,881	1,695	8.8	98.0	10.73	84%
2021	not published	1,247	3,946	14,302	1,605	8.9	87.2	30.10	39%
2020	not published	469	1,487	1,935	221	8.8	242.6	165.84	60%
2019	not published	2,817	8,839	27,427	2,613	10.5	102.7	14.13	88%
2018	not published	1,023	3,215	10,184	1,184	8.6	100.5	13.91	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd	9.00	16.73	−46%	172 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2023	not published	10.29	16.23	−37%	237 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	10.73	16.06	−33%	283 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2021	not published	30.10	16.69	+80%	1,062 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2019	not published	14.13	17.32	−18%	454 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2018	not published	13.91	17.14	−19%	443 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.