Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MTM Ship Management Pte Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 31 |
| CO₂ emitted | 161 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 67 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd13.5 (−19% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd | 30 | 13.5 | −19% | 66 | 10.9 | 2,366 | 7.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd9.9 (+23% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd | 1 | 9.9 | +23% | 103 | 10.8 | 1,715 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd | Lloyd's Register (31) | 100% | 0% | 94% | 0% |
MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM TORTOLA | 9742065 | Chemical tanker | 27.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +15% | 8.7 | 2,673 t | €47k |
| MTM SOUTHPORT | 9416032 | Chemical tanker | 23.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | 0% | 9.8 | 6,855 t | €127k |
| MTM MISSISSIPPI | 9315056 | Oil tanker | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | 0% | 10.8 | 5,980 t | €116k |
| MTM NEWPORT | 9774575 | Chemical tanker | 16.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −1% | 8.0 | 238 t | €4k |
| SCARLET RAY | 9799654 | Chemical tanker | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 12.0 | 8,488 t | €151k |
| MTM NORTH SOUND | 9360946 | Chemical tanker | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 11.4 | 4,241 t | €73k |
| MTM AMAZON | 9374533 | Chemical tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −10% | 11.6 | 5,716 t | €96k |
| MTM NEW ORLEANS | 9749398 | Chemical tanker | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −11% | 10.3 | 1,587 t | €27k |
| MTM KEY WEST | 9790672 | Chemical tanker | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −16% | 10.4 | 3,318 t | €59k |
| MTM WESTPORT | 9317858 | Chemical tanker | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −17% | 11.9 | 1,524 t | €23k |
| AMBER RAY | 9973664 | Chemical tanker | 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −18% | 12.4 | 9,654 t | €172k |
| LILAC RAY | 9883481 | Chemical tanker | 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −18% | 11.2 | 6,085 t | €106k |
| MTM AMSTERDAM | 9776444 | Chemical tanker | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −19% | 9.9 | 4,758 t | €96k |
| GOLDEN RAY | 9640102 | Chemical tanker | 18.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −20% | 10.8 | 9,658 t | €206k |
| MTM ROTTERDAM | 9477567 | Chemical tanker | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −22% | 10.0 | 2,981 t | €68k |
| MTM SINGAPORE | 9477529 | Chemical tanker | 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −24% | 9.9 | 5,718 t | €101k |
| MTM DUBLIN | 9335824 | Chemical tanker | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −25% | 9.2 | 2,119 t | €33k |
| SILVER RAY | 9493133 | Chemical tanker | 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −27% | 9.6 | 9,077 t | €180k |
| MTM SHANGHAI | 9345908 | Chemical tanker | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −28% | 11.2 | 6,926 t | €118k |
| MTM HOUSTON | 9505924 | Chemical tanker | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −29% | 11.5 | 4,370 t | €72k |
| MTM SAVANNAH | 9726750 | Chemical tanker | 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −30% | 9.3 | 2,357 t | €48k |
| CLEAROCEAN MARAUDER | 9890446 | Chemical tanker | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −31% | 11.9 | 4,014 t | €65k |
| MTM SANTOS | 9712606 | Chemical tanker | 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −31% | 10.0 | 3,683 t | €72k |
| MTM HAMBURG | 9379844 | Chemical tanker | 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −32% | 12.5 | 1,270 t | €23k |
| LAVENDER RAY | 9740794 | Chemical tanker | 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −34% | 11.3 | 9,681 t | €180k |
| AQUA RAY | 9973676 | Chemical tanker | 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −35% | 12.2 | 10,478 t | €182k |
| MTM PENANG | 9712591 | Chemical tanker | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −35% | 9.7 | 6,634 t | €116k |
| MTM KOBE | 9776456 | Chemical tanker | 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −36% | 10.8 | 5,973 t | €109k |
| INDIGO RAY | 9716016 | Chemical tanker | 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −39% | 11.7 | 9,223 t | €183k |
30 of 31 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.