Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

MORNING CELESTA

IMO: 9336062
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,757 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd. · part of Wilhelmsen Ship Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,757 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

96.1 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−5%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,298 t

CO₂ emitted

4,089 t

4,153 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

13,509 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

987 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 96.1 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−4%)

79.6Ranks 190 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.4 (−5%)

12.0Faster than 35% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−5%)

34.70Ranks 225 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU2%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU4%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,786 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MORNING CELESTA
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MORNING CELESTA
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MORNING CELESTA
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−3%	−10%	−62%	+22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+3%	+10%	+114%	−15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	−35%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−12%	−23%	−28%	−14%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+4%	+11%	+40%	−47%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	1,298	4,089	13,509	987	13.7	96.1	52.58	–
2024part-year	Wilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd	3,022	9,441	30,649	2,087	14.7	98.6	43.64	–
2024	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	3,551	11,108	35,913	2,416	14.9	98.9	43.06	–
2023	not published	1,607	5,089	16,795	1,200	14.0	95.7	50.43	–
2022	not published	2,795	8,843	25,985	1,847	14.1	107.5	40.35	–
2021	not published	4,462	14,093	36,337	2,265	16.0	122.8	47.05	–
2020	not published	3,062	9,673	25,962	1,728	15.0	118.0	87.99	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	52.58	55.36	−5%	225 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Wilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	43.06	55.31	−22%	75 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	50.43	56.64	−11%	152 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	40.35	57.66	−30%	47 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	47.05	59.57	−21%	104 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	87.99	57.26	+54%	358 of 449	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.