Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BAYERN GLORY

IMO: 9336775
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,399 t
Port of registry: San Marino
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CINCH, MIGHTY MAUD

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Sonar Ships Management Co.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,399 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

101.1 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.03

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+90%)

Average speed

5.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−45%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

242 t

CO₂ emitted

769 t

780 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,389 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

407 h

17 days, 5% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 101.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+22%)

61.0Ranks 2,939 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 5.9 kn · median 10.7 (−45%)

8.8Faster than 2% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+90%)

4.80Ranks 3,195 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU63%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU11%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (437 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.014

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BAYERN GLORY
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAYERN GLORY
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BAYERN GLORY
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.1 kn	+41%	−17%	+28%	−44%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.5 kn	−9%	+40%	−92%	+128%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+35%	+29%	+151%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−2.9 kn	−25%	−48%	−73%	−0%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+2%	+14%	+100%	−4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Sonar Ships Management Co.	242	769	2,389	407	5.9	101.1	15.03	–
2024	Sonar Ships Management Co.	133	421	1,860	186	10.0	71.5	26.85	–
2023	not published	1,719	5,398	21,982	3,367	6.5	78.2	11.77	–
2022	not published	509	1,605	8,761	1,287	6.8	58.1	9.56	–
2020	not published	2,487	7,885	32,175	3,306	9.7	77.3	9.59	–
2019	not published	1,218	3,818	16,068	1,835	8.8	75.8	10.04	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Sonar Ships Management Co.	15.03	7.89	+90%	3,195 of 3,610	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Sonar Ships Management Co.	26.85	8.09	+232%	3,012 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	11.77	8.27	+42%	2,732 of 3,548	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	9.56	8.71	+10%	2,337 of 3,968	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	9.59	8.24	+16%	2,054 of 3,150	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	10.04	8.38	+20%	2,255 of 3,360	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.