Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL GATTARA

IMO
9337705
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.32 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
380
LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+50%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
12.5
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+20%)
Average speed
15.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+11%)
Fuel per day at sea
143.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,422 t
CO₂ emitted
39,231 t
Distance sailed
32,726 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,081 h
87 days, 24% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 346 kg/nm · median 190 (+82%)
152Ranks 367 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)
11.2Faster than 44% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.2 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+44%)
5.06Ranks 302 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU44%
  • Into the EU53%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
6,646 t
54% of all fuel; 47% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,153 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AL GATTARA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AL GATTARA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AL GATTARA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2025−1.6 kn−9%−18%+100%−18%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022−1.0 kn+5%−1%−19%+16%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+5.2 kn+5%+52%+19%−7%5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−5.1 kn+9%−25%+364%–5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd22,58869,15265,3034,62414.1346––
2022not published12,42239,23132,7262,08115.7380–54%
2020not published14,72046,50340,6502,44116.7362––
2019not published11,82136,83534,2482,99011.5345–100%
2018not published2,3257,2827,37644416.6315–4%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd10.27.12+44%302 of 386DNVB+C
2022not published12.510.4+20%252 of 379ABSC
2020not published10.710.7+0%135 of 267ABSB+C
2019not published11.510.9+6%137 of 248ABSB+C
2018not published––––ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.