Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MESAIMEER

IMO: 9337729
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.32 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

366

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+17%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

122.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,860 t

CO₂ emitted

31,102 t

Distance sailed

26,909 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,933 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 284 kg/nm · median 190 (+49%)

152Ranks 308 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.4 (+5%)

11.2Faster than 71% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.35 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+17%)

5.06Ranks 239 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU40%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

5,709 t

58% of all fuel; 42% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

740 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MESAIMEER
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MESAIMEER
LNG carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MESAIMEER
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+1.2 kn	−22%	−16%	+80%	−22%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	−11%	−27%	+24%	−54%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+19%	+32%	−63%	+12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	−6%	−20%	+72%	+88%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	+14%	+47%	−13%	+2%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	−6%	−18%	+52%	−8%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	13,787	42,856	48,520	3,217	15.1	284	–	–
2023	not published	9,860	31,102	26,909	1,933	13.9	366	–	58%
2022	not published	8,926	28,154	21,635	1,284	16.8	413	–	45%
2021	not published	20,131	63,538	58,005	3,830	15.1	347	–	–
2020	not published	12,530	39,500	33,784	1,904	17.7	371	–	–
2019	not published	12,671	39,675	38,986	2,828	13.8	325	–	–
2018	not published	8,884	27,704	25,717	1,618	15.9	345	–	53%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	8.35	7.12	+17%	239 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.7	9.10	+17%	230 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	23.1	10.4	+123%	333 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	20.7	10.5	+98%	261 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.0	10.7	+3%	146 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	10.8	10.9	−0%	122 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	11.8	10.9	+8%	120 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.