Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

TEMBEK

IMO: 9337731
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.33 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

341

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+12%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

124.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,266 t

CO₂ emitted

63,979 t

Distance sailed

59,420 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,896 h

162 days, 44% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 350 kg/nm · median 190 (+84%)

152Ranks 371 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 14.4 (+4%)

11.2Faster than 66% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.15 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−28%)

5.06Ranks 49 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

10,153 t

50% of all fuel; 50% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,566 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TEMBEK
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

TEMBEK
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

TEMBEK
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.3 kn	+2%	+1%	−80%	−50%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+9%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+3.5 kn	−17%	+8%	+135%	−4%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.1 kn	+6%	−22%	−16%	+35%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+11%	+23%	−52%	−26%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−5%	−12%	+111%	+19%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	4,223	13,209	12,083	807	15.0	350	–	–
2023	not published	20,266	63,979	59,420	3,896	15.3	341	–	50%
2022	not published	18,314	57,845	54,474	3,562	15.3	336	–	51%
2021	not published	9,404	29,678	23,205	1,969	11.8	405	–	–
2020	not published	10,484	33,064	27,469	1,722	15.9	382	–	–
2019	not published	19,559	61,213	56,662	3,953	14.3	345	–	100%
2018	not published	9,745	30,537	26,830	1,731	15.5	363	–	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	5.15	7.12	−28%	49 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.2	9.10	+12%	206 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	11.8	10.4	+14%	233 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	12.3	10.5	+18%	185 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.10	10.7	−15%	84 of 267	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.3	10.9	+13%	161 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	10.4	10.9	−5%	81 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.