Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL HAMLA

IMO: 9337743
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

390

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+25%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

124.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,918 t

CO₂ emitted

34,418 t

Distance sailed

27,995 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,099 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 311 kg/nm · median 190 (+63%)

152Ranks 341 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 64% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+46%)

5.06Ranks 306 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

5,612 t

51% of all fuel; 49% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

778 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL HAMLA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AL HAMLA
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL HAMLA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+6.8 kn	−11%	+64%	+62%	−3%	6.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.2 kn	−11%	−46%	+86%	−17%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+8%	−7%	+21%	+5%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−4%	−11%	−7%	+9%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+1%	+22%	−69%	−0%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+8%	−1%	+444%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	26,354	81,389	84,661	5,671	14.9	311	–	–
2023	not published	18,142	57,302	52,146	6,412	8.1	348	–	46%
2022	not published	10,918	34,418	27,995	2,099	13.3	390	–	51%
2021	not published	8,383	26,467	23,142	1,502	15.4	362	–	–
2020	not published	9,397	29,669	24,844	1,502	16.5	378	–	–
2019	not published	29,810	93,079	79,947	5,793	13.8	373	–	100%
2018	not published	5,077	15,901	14,706	980	15.0	345	–	59%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	10.4	7.12	+46%	306 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.7	9.10	+18%	233 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	13.0	10.4	+25%	261 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	12.4	10.5	+19%	188 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.3	10.7	+6%	155 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	11.4	10.9	+5%	134 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	9.71	10.9	−11%	63 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.