Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

RHOURD EL HAMRA

IMO
9337793
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
6,054 t
Flag (estimated)
Algeria
Port of registry
Oran
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,564 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
85.4
Gas carrier (LPG) median 91.1 kg/nm (−6%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
40.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 45.9 (−11%)
Average speed
10.7 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 10.4 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,426 t
CO₂ emitted
10,736 t
Distance sailed
40,097 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,759 h
157 days, 43% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+35%)
49.8Ranks 281 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 12.6 (+10%)
8.8Faster than 73% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 57.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+62%)
14.4Ranks 242 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU40%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
2,086 t
61% of all fuel; 39% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
940 t
8.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • RHOURD EL HAMRA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • RHOURD EL HAMRA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RHOURD EL HAMRA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.0 kn+49%+39%−4%+58%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 49%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.7 kn−18%−8%+32%−28%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.7 kn+7%+2%−7%+16%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+1.8 kn−72%−67%−11%−72%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 72%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.1 kn+246%+250%+1%+259%Same speed, fuel per mile up 246%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.2 kn+1%+12%−39%+6%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.9 kn−9%−29%+4%−9%2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA2,8358,97725,7781,86913.811057.546%
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA1,9916,30726,9341,82614.873.936.448%
2023not published1,8405,82920,3441,54913.190.450.856%
2022not published1,8495,85721,9001,58613.884.443.949%
2021not published7,33623,30824,6442,04712.029815618%
2020not published2,1076,66624,5042,05811.986.043.357%
2019not published3,42610,73640,0973,75910.785.440.861%
2018not published3,61411,31838,4662,82713.693.945.060%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA57.535.6+62%242 of 355Bureau VeritasB
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA36.435.8+2%158 of 306Bureau VeritasB
2023not published50.841.8+22%191 of 330Bureau VeritasB
2022not published43.942.5+3%179 of 348Bureau VeritasB
2021not published15646.9+232%308 of 323Bureau VeritasB
2020not published43.342.3+2%178 of 339Bureau VeritasB
2019not published40.845.9−11%154 of 331Bureau VeritasB
2018not published45.053.1−15%134 of 297Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.