Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LONGVIEW LOGGER

IMO
9338541
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.22 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Pacific Basin Shipping (HK) Limited

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
60.3 kg/nm
General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (+3%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
15.56
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (−19%)
Average speed
9.0 kn
General cargo median 10.5 kn (−14%)
Fuel per day at sea
13.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
323 t
CO₂ emitted
1,017 t
1,033 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
5,357 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
594 h
25 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 60.3 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+3%)
34.9Ranks 575 of 1,111, lowest first87.0
Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 10.5 (−14%)
7.8Faster than 20% of general cargo ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 15.56 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (−19%)
7.51Ranks 429 of 1,111, lowest first39.26
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports29%
  • From the EU9%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU11%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (712 t).

Fuel burned laden
71%
30% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
10.7%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • LONGVIEW LOGGER
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • LONGVIEW LOGGER
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • LONGVIEW LOGGER
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2024−2.6 kn−10%−30%−70%+90%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024Pacific Basin Shipping (HK) Limited3231,0175,3575949.060.3–71%
2022not published1,2023,80517,9761,54611.666.9–87%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2024Pacific Basin Shipping (HK) Limited15.5619.25−19%429 of 1,111ABSA
2022not published8.2021.57−62%77 of 1,034ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.