Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

VIKING CARINA

IMO: 9338709
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 232 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MORNING CARINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 232 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.2 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

1,256

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

15.4 kn

Fuel per day at sea

34.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,302 t

CO₂ emitted

4,066 t

4,130 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

13,970 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

909 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 335 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 94.5 kg/nm · median 103.3 (−9%)

80.4Ranks 91 of 335, lowest first119.6

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)

12.3Faster than 45% of vehicle carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.05 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.31 (−24%)

37.69Ranks 68 of 335, lowest first158.40

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU91%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VIKING CARINA
Ro-ro median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIKING CARINA
Ro-ro median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VIKING CARINA
Ro-ro median

20.040.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−1%	+7%	−73%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	−0%	−9%	+42%	+18%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−13.2 kn	−24%	−59%	+2,677%	−62%	13.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+10.5 kn	+21%	+90%	−95%	+94%	10.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	+78%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−0%	+19%	−44%	−31%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+6%	+5%	+83%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,302	4,066	13,970	909	15.4	93.2	1,255.84	–
2025	GCC Shipowning AS	1,302	4,066	13,970	909	15.4	93.2	1,255.84	–
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	4,808	15,093	50,862	3,577	14.2	94.5	42.05	–
2023	not published	3,402	10,627	35,933	2,308	15.6	94.7	35.70	–
2022	not published	162	518	1,294	45	28.8	125.0	92.75	–
2021	not published	2,734	8,657	26,428	1,442	18.3	103.4	47.77	–
2020	not published	1,682	5,312	14,842	809	18.3	113.3	56.11	–
2019	not published	3,011	9,437	26,552	1,729	15.4	113.4	81.78	–
2018	not published	1,545	4,840	14,503	930	15.6	106.5	78.79	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B+C
2025	GCC Shipowning AS	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	–
2024	FLEET SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	42.05	55.31	−24%	68 of 335	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	35.70	56.64	−37%	25 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	92.75	57.66	+61%	385 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	47.77	103.64	−54%	13 of 219	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	56.11	102.77	−45%	31 of 238	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	81.78	90.89	−10%	112 of 271	ABS	C
2018	not published	78.79	91.03	−13%	92 of 260	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.