Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CIELO DI GUANGZHOU

IMO: 9341512
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,997 t
Flag (estimated): Luxembourg
Port of registry: Luxembourg
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.30 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,997 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

104

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (−10%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,046 t

CO₂ emitted

12,685 t

Distance sailed

38,828 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,261 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,321 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 104 kg/nm · median 88.3 (+18%)

57.3Ranks 974 of 1,321, lowest first121

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 10.1 (−10%)

6.3Faster than 36% of chemical tanker ships12.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.3 (−10%)

9.31Ranks 546 of 1,321, lowest first43.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU28%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

894 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CIELO DI GUANGZHOU
Chemical tanker median

85.090.095.0100.0105.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

CIELO DI GUANGZHOU
Chemical tanker median

9.09.39.59.810.010.3

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CIELO DI GUANGZHOU
Chemical tanker median

15.016.017.018.019.020.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+2%	−2%	+17%	−19%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	4,046	12,685	38,828	4,261	9.1	104	15.6	–
2018	not published	3,406	10,695	33,226	3,526	9.4	103	19.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	15.6	17.3	−10%	546 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	19.2	17.1	+12%	763 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.