Navalyze

Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

EQUULEUS LEADER

IMO
9342906
Type
Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried
6,238 t
Flag (estimated)
Japan (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency
EIV 25.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,336 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
99.2
Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−5%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
42.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (−32%)
Average speed
15.1 kn
Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
35.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,274 t
CO₂ emitted
7,119 t
Distance sailed
22,916 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,518 h
63 days, 17% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+3%)
79.6Ranks 299 of 506, lowest first119
Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)
12.0Faster than 30% of vehicle carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−7%)
34.7Ranks 217 of 506, lowest first158
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports23%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU26%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
364 t
5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EQUULEUS LEADER
  • Vehicle carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • EQUULEUS LEADER
  • Vehicle carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EQUULEUS LEADER
  • Vehicle carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−2.3 kn+0%−14%−11%–2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.6 kn+3%−6%+100%–1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2023+2.3 kn−0%+15%−67%−6%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.1,3834,33613,46799813.510351.6–
2024MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.1,5574,85615,21096315.8102––
2023not published7552,3787,61243717.499.140.0–
2018not published2,2747,11922,9161,51815.199.242.4–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmVehicle carrier medianvs Vehicle carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.51.655.4−7%217 of 506ClassNKC
2024MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.––––ClassNKC
2023not published40.056.6−29%48 of 417ClassNKC
2018not published42.462.4−32%23 of 434ClassNKA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.