Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 33 kt−41.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 96 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 1 |
| Main segment | Vehicle carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.53.5 (−3% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | 4 | 53.5 | −3% | 95 | 13.6 | 1,229 | 3.7% | 1 |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.5.5 (−31% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | 3 | 5.5 | −31% | 97 | 11.0 | 1,603 | 2.2% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | ClassNK (7) | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
MITSUBISHI ORE TRANSPORT CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOLLON LEADER | 9402706 | Vehicle carrier | 55.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | 0% | 13.4 | 4,013 t | €86k |
| WILD ROSE LEADERLNG | 9925370 | Vehicle carrier | 34.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | −1% | 13.9 | 7,006 t | €202k |
| KING MILO | 9609512 | Bulk carrier | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −3% | 12.0 | 3,996 t | €106k |
| EQUULEUS LEADER | 9342906 | Vehicle carrier | 51.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.4 | −7% | 13.5 | 4,336 t | €117k |
| SANTA SOPHIA | 9404766 | Bulk carrier | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −7% | 10.2 | 6,714 t | €178k |
| GAIA LEADER | 9536818 | Vehicle carrier | 67.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | −12% | 13.5 | 3,732 t | €95k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.