Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL DENVER

IMO
9345960
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
9,254 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 22.97 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,671 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
221
Container median 182 kg/nm (+21%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
24.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+23%)
Average speed
15.5 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (+12%)
Fuel per day at sea
82.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
17,438 t
CO₂ emitted
54,422 t
Distance sailed
79,081 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,090 h
212 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 165 kg/nm · median 174 (−5%)
82.1Ranks 860 of 1,788, lowest first309
Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.7 (−9%)
8.6Faster than 33% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (+194%)
7.86Ranks 1,615 of 1,788, lowest first55.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports18%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU36%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,804 t
7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • APL DENVER
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • APL DENVER
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APL DENVER
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2019−3.1 kn−25%−40%−89%+123%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2019not published1,4044,3758,50868512.416555.6–
2018not published17,43854,42279,0815,09015.522124.9–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published55.618.9+194%1,615 of 1,788ABSB
2018not published24.920.2+23%1,038 of 1,705ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.