Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

FSL HONG KONG

IMO
9346732
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
61,708 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.19 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,943 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
448
Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+225%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
24.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (+181%)
Average speed
6.4 kn
Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (−34%)
Fuel per day at sea
69.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,655 t
CO₂ emitted
33,548 t
Distance sailed
23,765 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,701 h
154 days, 42% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 167 kg/nm · median 134 (+25%)
81.5Ranks 1,404 of 1,870, lowest first204
Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.0 (−3%)
8.1Faster than 43% of oil tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (−6%)
4.81Ranks 853 of 1,870, lowest first26.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU67%
  • Into the EU24%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,630 t
4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • FSL HONG KONG
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • FSL HONG KONG
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • FSL HONG KONG
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+4.3 kn−63%−38%+32%−66%4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 63%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.3 kn+128%+117%+350%+257%Same speed, fuel per mile up 128%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published5,23216,43831,3402,91710.71678.50–
2019not published10,65533,54823,7653,7016.444824.8–
2018not published1,0403,2495,2827846.71976.95–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published8.509.03−6%853 of 1,870DNVC
2019not published24.88.83+181%1,723 of 1,919DNVC
2018not published6.958.86−22%573 of 1,779DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.