Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SINAR MALAHAYATI

IMO
9349643
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
116,961 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 8.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
SARANGA
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,576 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
77.4
Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (−14%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
19.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+13%)
Average speed
11.3 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+12%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,757 t
CO₂ emitted
5,516 t
Distance sailed
22,712 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,002 h
83 days, 23% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,343 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.3 kg/nm · median 83.0 (−23%)
56.3Ranks 259 of 1,343, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.2 (−3%)
8.9Faster than 41% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.92 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (−41%)
9.56Ranks 169 of 1,343, lowest first41.0
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports29%
  • From the EU23%
  • Into the EU33%
  • At berth in the EU14%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
627 t
11.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SINAR MALAHAYATI
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SINAR MALAHAYATI
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SINAR MALAHAYATI
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022+1.4 kn−11%+1%+33%–1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2021−0.4 kn−17%−20%−59%−49%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published7012,18912,23399612.357.31.53–
2021not published5931,8579,22284410.964.39.92–
2018not published1,7575,51622,7122,00211.377.419.3–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published––––Lloyd's RegisterB
2021not published9.9216.7−41%169 of 1,343ABSA+B+C
2018not published19.317.1+13%769 of 1,294ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.