Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CORFU'

IMO: 9349758
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Bari
Technical efficiency: EIV 20.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

152

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

829

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

84.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−67%)

Average speed

18.2 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,783 t

CO₂ emitted

49,283 t

Distance sailed

103,706 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,683 h

237 days, 65% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156 kg/nm · median 150 (+4%)

69.3Ranks 222 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.2 kn · median 15.8 (+9%)

12.0Faster than 64% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,693 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+199%)

66.8Ranks 377 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 82.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−68%)

48.6Ranks 75 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,701 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CORFU'
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORFU'
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CORFU'
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CORFU'
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	+7%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+2%	+6%	−10%	−1%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	+7%	−3%	−23%	+97%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	−8%	−20%	−1%	−44%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−8%	+2%	+32%	−11%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−4%	−0%	+3%	+57%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+4%	+1%	+30%	+75%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	11,960	37,362	76,878	4,470	17.2	156	–	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	11,991	37,493	72,118	4,181	17.3	166	–	–
2023	not published	13,071	40,879	80,109	4,847	16.5	163	–	–
2022	not published	15,783	49,283	103,706	5,683	18.2	152	–	–
2021	not published	17,183	53,650	104,413	4,928	21.2	165	–	–
2020	not published	14,199	44,417	78,982	4,148	19.0	180	–	–
2019	not published	14,308	44,973	76,538	4,166	18.4	187	–	–
2018	not published	10,653	33,491	59,073	3,140	18.8	180	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	1,693	567	+199%	377 of 408	82.1	253	−68%	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	1,611	547	+195%	353 of 404	95.1	233	−59%	RINA	A
2023	not published	1,630	680	+140%	343 of 386	107	234	−54%	RINA	A
2022	not published	829	626	+32%	235 of 394	84.5	253	−67%	RINA	A
2021	not published	1,476	815	+81%	308 of 377	114	226	−49%	RINA	A
2020	not published	1,649	751	+120%	304 of 387	93.6	217	−57%	RINA	A
2019	not published	1,049	569	+84%	297 of 394	78.6	223	−65%	RINA	A
2018	not published	600	729	−18%	165 of 361	68.2	184	−63%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.