Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CONNEMARA

IMO: 9349760
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

162

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,907

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+299%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

281

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+53%)

Average speed

19.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

75.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,532 t

CO₂ emitted

42,350 t

Distance sailed

83,788 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,317 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2022

Set against all 394 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 171 kg/nm · median 157 (+9%)

79.7Ranks 233 of 394, lowest first241

Average speedThis ship 19.5 kn · median 16.0 (+22%)

12.3Faster than 79% of ro-pax ships22.6

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,302 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 626 (+108%)

71.5Ranks 335 of 394, lowest first1,606

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 159 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−37%)

66.3Ranks 147 of 394, lowest first1,135

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,621 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONNEMARA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

CONNEMARA
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CONNEMARA
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CONNEMARA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+7%	+8%	−10%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.6 kn	−8%	+29%	+170%	−46%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.9 kn	−6%	−31%	−55%	+640%	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+14%	+10%	+30%	−81%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022	not published	20,602	65,259	120,289	6,168	19.5	171	–	–
2021	not published	21,244	67,134	133,051	6,872	19.4	160	–	–
2020	not published	8,526	27,137	49,301	3,560	13.8	173	–	–
2019	not published	20,088	62,852	108,852	5,815	18.7	185	–	–
2018	not published	13,532	42,350	83,788	4,317	19.4	162	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	1,302	626	+108%	335 of 394	159	253	−37%	DNV	B
2021	not published	2,155	815	+164%	337 of 377	153	226	−32%	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	4,021	751	+435%	371 of 387	673	217	+210%	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	543	569	−5%	189 of 394	621	223	+179%	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	2,907	729	+299%	327 of 361	281	184	+53%	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.