Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE PALMA

IMO: 9349772
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EIV 20.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

174

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

230

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−66%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

233

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−0%)

Average speed

17.9 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,902 t

CO₂ emitted

46,541 t

Distance sailed

85,811 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,802 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 158 kg/nm · median 150 (+5%)

69.3Ranks 232 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.0 kn · median 15.8 (+14%)

12.0Faster than 70% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 140 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−75%)

66.8Ranks 99 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 198 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−22%)

48.6Ranks 174 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,500 t

7.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CIUDAD DE PALMA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CIUDAD DE PALMA
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CIUDAD DE PALMA
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CIUDAD DE PALMA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	+14%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−1%	−0%	−7%	−44%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	+4%	+140%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+8%	+17%	−4%	−57%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−1%	−6%	+8%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	−7%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+7%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	14,284	44,820	90,555	5,031	18.0	158	–	–
2024	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	13,757	42,974	79,590	4,444	17.9	173	–	–
2023	not published	14,902	46,541	85,811	4,802	17.9	174	–	–
2022	not published	14,408	45,030	82,320	4,572	18.0	175	–	–
2021	not published	13,846	43,243	85,675	5,126	16.7	162	–	–
2020	not published	12,955	40,463	79,257	4,514	17.6	163	–	–
2019	not published	14,396	44,984	85,439	4,944	17.3	169	–	–
2018	not published	13,655	42,642	79,828	4,729	16.9	171	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	140	567	−75%	99 of 408	198	253	−22%	RINA	A+C
2024	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	128	547	−77%	101 of 404	218	233	−6%	RINA	A+C
2023	not published	230	680	−66%	100 of 386	233	234	−0%	RINA	A+C
2022	not published	95.9	626	−85%	67 of 394	247	253	−2%	RINA	A+C
2021	not published	221	815	−73%	101 of 377	227	226	+0%	RINA	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	52.7	729	−93%	55 of 361	0.95	184	−99%	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.