Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CORDOBA

IMO
9349801
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
32,344 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.20 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,344 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
238
Container median 174 kg/nm (+36%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
22.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+21%)
Average speed
16.5 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+20%)
Fuel per day at sea
94.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
22,340 t
CO₂ emitted
69,613 t
Distance sailed
93,863 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,680 h
237 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 238 kg/nm · median 174 (+36%)
82.1Ranks 1,187 of 1,788, lowest first309
Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.7 (+20%)
8.6Faster than 90% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (+21%)
7.86Ranks 1,066 of 1,788, lowest first55.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports10%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU44%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,657 t
2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC CORDOBA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC CORDOBA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC CORDOBA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2019−1.3 kn−7%−14%−14%−2%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2019not published22,34069,61393,8635,68016.523822.9–
2018not published27,96387,077108,7266,10317.825723.4–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published22.918.9+21%1,066 of 1,788DNVC
2018not published23.420.2+16%985 of 1,705DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.