Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VICTORIA SEAWAYS

IMO: 9350721
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Lithuania
Port of registry: Klaipeda
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.15 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

137

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

632

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

84.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−64%)

Average speed

19.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,421 t

CO₂ emitted

57,515 t

Distance sailed

134,526 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,799 h

283 days, 78% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 132 kg/nm · median 150 (−12%)

69.3Ranks 145 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 19.4 kn · median 15.8 (+23%)

12.0Faster than 80% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,691 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+198%)

66.8Ranks 375 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 37.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−85%)

48.6Ranks 24 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,587 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VICTORIA SEAWAYS
Ro-pax median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VICTORIA SEAWAYS
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VICTORIA SEAWAYS
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VICTORIA SEAWAYS
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,0002,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	+1%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−6%	−8%	−14%	+138%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	+2%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−7%	−6%	+0%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−0%	−1%	−2%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+3%	+12%	+12%	+23%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−3%	−12%	−14%	−74%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AB DFDS Seaways	15,485	48,366	117,177	6,042	19.4	132	–	–
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	14,836	46,353	115,545	5,989	19.3	128	–	–
2023	not published	18,421	57,515	134,526	6,799	19.8	137	–	–
2022	not published	18,475	57,682	132,524	6,639	20.0	139	–	–
2021	not published	19,818	61,879	132,143	6,671	19.8	150	–	–
2020	not published	20,397	63,526	135,357	6,828	19.8	151	–	–
2019	not published	17,626	54,902	120,447	6,580	18.3	146	–	–
2018	not published	21,164	65,918	140,616	6,967	20.2	151	134	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	AB DFDS Seaways	1,691	567	+198%	375 of 408	37.7	253	−85%	DNV	B
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	1,505	547	+175%	344 of 404	30.8	233	−87%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	632	680	−7%	183 of 386	84.0	234	−64%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	689	626	+10%	207 of 394	84.8	253	−66%	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	891	815	+9%	196 of 377	98.0	226	−57%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	690	751	−8%	188 of 387	90.3	217	−59%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	561	569	−1%	193 of 394	88.3	223	−60%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	2,161	729	+196%	307 of 361	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.