Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CRUISE BARCELONA

IMO
9351488
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
351
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+127%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
2,273
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+179%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
71.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−68%)
Average speed
24.4 kn
Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+51%)
Fuel per day at sea
205.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
49,198 t
CO₂ emitted
153,315 t
Distance sailed
140,228 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,746 h
239 days, 66% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 285 kg/nm · median 150 (+90%)
69.3Ranks 400 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 21.2 kn · median 15.8 (+34%)
12.0Faster than 86% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,251 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+121%)
66.8Ranks 336 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 78.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−69%)
48.6Ranks 70 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports98%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,603 t
2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CRUISE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • CRUISE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CRUISE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • CRUISE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−6%−8%−15%+31%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.2 kn+2%+3%−3%+1%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.2 kn−4%−5%+8%−12%Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−2.7 kn−12%−22%−10%−53%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.0 kn+4%+4%+7%−35%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020−0.5 kn−1%−3%+31%+210%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019+1.4 kn+3%+9%−31%+54%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A32,081100,073112,4695,30721.2285––
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A39,977124,615132,4456,09121.7302––
2023not published40,172125,206135,9396,33621.5296––
2022not published38,840121,040126,4065,83621.7307––
2021not published49,198153,315140,2285,74624.4351––
2020not published44,301138,065131,4115,39624.4337––
2019not published33,923106,431100,0644,02324.9339––
2018not published47,438149,280144,2906,14023.5329––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A1,251567+121%336 of 40878.5253−69%RINAA
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A953547+74%279 of 40468.7233−71%RINAA
2023not published941680+38%251 of 38673.3234−69%RINAA
2022not published1,072626+71%285 of 39467.1253−73%RINAA
2021not published2,273815+179%342 of 37771.9226−68%RINAA
2020not published3,488751+364%368 of 38775.9217−65%RINAA
2019not published1,124569+98%306 of 39480.9223−64%RINAA
2018not published731729+0%182 of 36133.1184−82%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.