Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CRUISE EUROPA

IMO
9351490
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
283
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+83%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,241
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+52%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
108
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−52%)
Average speed
21.9 kn
Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+35%)
Fuel per day at sea
148.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
31,973 t
CO₂ emitted
99,730 t
Distance sailed
113,178 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,166 h
215 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 237 kg/nm · median 150 (+58%)
69.3Ranks 375 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 18.1 kn · median 15.8 (+15%)
12.0Faster than 70% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 534 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−6%)
66.8Ranks 196 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 150 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−41%)
48.6Ranks 139 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports96%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,730 t
3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CRUISE EUROPA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • CRUISE EUROPA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CRUISE EUROPA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • CRUISE EUROPA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.8 kn+3%−1%+26%+21%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.3 kn−5%+2%−10%−13%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.8 kn+2%−2%−9%−12%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−3.5 kn−16%−30%−11%−54%3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−4.0 kn−12%−26%−3%−53%4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.3 kn−1%+4%−21%+78%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.8 kn+3%+11%−8%+47%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A24,76377,390104,5165,78418.1237––
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A19,07759,61683,0154,40218.9230––
2023not published22,31069,75392,6285,25117.6241––
2022not published23,94474,822101,2795,50718.4236––
2021not published31,97399,730113,1785,16621.9283––
2020not published37,485116,839116,2144,48225.9323––
2019not published47,980150,191147,2365,98724.6326––
2018not published50,662158,509160,6507,03822.8315––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A534567−6%196 of 408150253−41%RINAA
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A441547−19%181 of 404138233−41%RINAA
2023not published505680−26%156 of 386125234−46%RINAA
2022not published576626−8%188 of 394116253−54%RINAA
2021not published1,241815+52%281 of 377108226−52%RINAA
2020not published2,627751+250%351 of 387108217−50%RINAA
2019not published1,474569+159%337 of 39497.3223−56%RINAA
2018not published1,006729+38%226 of 36138.1184−79%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.