Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CRUISE SARDEGNA

IMO: 9351505
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CRUISE OLYMPIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+99%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,919

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+289%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

111

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−49%)

Average speed

25.2 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+59%)

Fuel per day at sea

188.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

48,500 t

CO₂ emitted

151,141 t

Distance sailed

155,521 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,166 h

257 days, 70% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 235 kg/nm · median 150 (+56%)

69.3Ranks 370 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.7 kn · median 15.8 (+18%)

12.0Faster than 75% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 499 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−12%)

66.8Ranks 187 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 151 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−40%)

48.6Ranks 140 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,763 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CRUISE SARDEGNA
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CRUISE SARDEGNA
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CRUISE SARDEGNA
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CRUISE SARDEGNA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+1%	−0%	−9%	−6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−2%	+1%	−1%	−6%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+3%	−1%	+3%	−12%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−17%	−22%	−1%	−36%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.9 kn	−11%	−28%	−32%	−66%	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−5%	−7%	+50%	+172%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+3.0 kn	+9%	+23%	−37%	+14%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	22,905	71,639	97,525	5,207	18.7	235	–	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	24,828	77,627	106,870	5,616	19.0	232	–	–
2023	not published	25,797	80,618	108,357	5,867	18.5	238	–	–
2022	not published	24,396	76,205	105,098	5,512	19.1	232	–	–
2021	not published	29,589	92,324	106,384	5,236	20.3	278	–	–
2020	not published	48,500	151,141	155,521	6,166	25.2	312	–	–
2019	not published	33,950	106,260	103,399	4,006	25.8	328	–	–
2018	not published	49,964	156,495	165,374	7,245	22.8	302	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	499	567	−12%	187 of 408	151	253	−40%	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	531	547	−3%	199 of 404	129	233	−45%	RINA	A
2023	not published	563	680	−17%	167 of 386	120	234	−49%	RINA	A
2022	not published	642	626	+3%	200 of 394	101	253	−60%	RINA	A
2021	not published	997	815	+22%	223 of 377	118	226	−48%	RINA	A
2020	not published	2,919	751	+289%	360 of 387	111	217	−49%	RINA	A
2019	not published	1,073	569	+89%	301 of 394	99.4	223	−55%	RINA	A
2018	not published	937	729	+29%	213 of 361	39.1	184	−79%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.