Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TAMARA

IMO: 9351579
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,927 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,023 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

179

Container median 178 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+8%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,493 t

CO₂ emitted

45,175 t

Distance sailed

81,150 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,875 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 189 kg/nm · median 177 (+7%)

78.8Ranks 1,203 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+40%)

7.22Ranks 1,475 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU42%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,599 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC TAMARA
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TAMARA
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TAMARA
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+2%	+5%	+4%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	−12%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−4%	−18%	−19%	+28%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	+9%	+2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.8 kn	+9%	+35%	+59%	+7%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−0%	−15%	+82%	−0%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−9%	−13%	−47%	−16%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,410	35,793	60,285	4,923	12.2	189	22.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,813	33,703	58,168	4,888	11.9	186	25.0	–
2023	not published	11,324	35,382	65,856	5,597	11.8	172	26.4	–
2022	not published	14,493	45,175	81,150	5,875	13.8	179	20.6	–
2021	not published	13,988	43,588	74,315	5,199	14.3	188	20.2	–
2020	not published	8,022	25,042	46,629	4,038	11.5	172	18.9	–
2019	not published	4,430	13,877	25,648	1,886	13.6	173	19.0	–
2018	not published	9,083	28,551	47,976	3,349	14.3	189	22.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.9	16.3	+40%	1,475 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.0	17.5	+42%	1,325 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	26.4	19.4	+36%	1,240 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	20.6	19.1	+8%	967 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.2	17.9	+13%	1,003 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	18.9	17.6	+8%	965 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	19.0	18.9	+1%	903 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	22.6	20.2	+12%	960 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.