Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PLUTO

IMO: 9353137
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,601 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CPO ITALY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,603 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.3

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+7%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,634 t

CO₂ emitted

11,428 t

Distance sailed

39,806 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,962 h

207 days, 57% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.8 kg/nm · median 81.9 (+15%)

55.0Ranks 901 of 1,314, lowest first115

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 11.2 (−21%)

9.1Faster than 9% of chemical tanker ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.2 (+45%)

9.07Ranks 899 of 1,314, lowest first43.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU19%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,226 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PLUTO
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

PLUTO
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PLUTO
Chemical tanker median

12.515.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−2.4 kn	+1%	−20%	+39%	+61%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+17%	+25%	−49%	−8%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−6%	−14%	−13%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	+5%	+39%	+20%	+0%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−12%	−4%	+14%	−15%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	628	1,963	6,485	1,007	6.4	96.8	10.0	–
2023	not published	3,131	9,877	33,396	3,760	8.9	93.8	23.5	–
2022	not published	2,230	7,066	24,072	2,132	11.3	92.6	14.6	–
2021	not published	3,733	11,843	47,126	4,468	10.5	79.2	15.9	–
2020	not published	4,579	14,481	54,248	4,678	11.6	84.4	15.6	–
2019	not published	3,624	11,444	45,210	5,139	8.8	80.2	15.6	–
2018	not published	3,634	11,428	39,806	4,962	8.0	91.3	18.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B
2023	not published	23.5	16.2	+45%	899 of 1,314	DNV	A+B
2022	not published	14.6	16.1	−9%	589 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	15.9	16.7	−5%	620 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.6	16.2	−4%	614 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	15.6	17.3	−10%	547 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	18.4	17.1	+7%	725 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.