Navalyze · Container · Ship

LINDA

IMO: 9354325
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,864 t
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Pikis
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,788 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.7

Container median 172 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+184%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,883 t

CO₂ emitted

21,457 t

Distance sailed

89,773 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,387 h

266 days, 73% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 272 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 39% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+222%)

7.22Ranks 2,053 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports71%
From the EU6%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

554 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LINDA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LINDA
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LINDA
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−7%	−10%	−14%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+11%	+16%	+15%	+9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+27%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+15%	−3%	−33%	+10%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	−9%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+2%	+6%	−3%	+8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−1%	+17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	5,562	17,349	67,992	5,400	12.6	81.8	52.5	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	7,005	21,838	79,211	6,131	12.9	88.4	56.4	–
2023	not published	5,516	17,207	69,108	5,615	12.3	79.8	51.9	–
2022	not published	4,474	13,977	54,489	4,425	12.3	82.1	53.4	–
2021	not published	5,828	18,166	81,672	5,580	14.6	71.4	48.5	–
2020	not published	6,883	21,457	89,773	6,387	14.1	76.7	49.9	–
2019	not published	6,927	21,593	92,522	6,806	13.6	74.9	46.1	–
2018	not published	7,013	21,858	93,073	6,684	13.9	75.3	39.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	52.5	16.3	+222%	2,053 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	56.4	17.5	+222%	1,832 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	51.9	19.4	+167%	1,709 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	53.4	19.1	+179%	1,650 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	48.5	17.9	+171%	1,587 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	49.9	17.6	+184%	1,596 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	46.1	18.9	+144%	1,498 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	39.5	20.2	+96%	1,340 of 1,705	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.