Navalyze · Container · Ship

AILA

IMO: 9354337
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,505 t
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Pikis
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,176 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.6

Container median 182 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+89%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,933 t

CO₂ emitted

21,613 t

Distance sailed

91,656 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,706 h

279 days, 77% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 168 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+161%)

7.22Ranks 1,923 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU4%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

536 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AILA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AILA
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AILA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−8%	−3%	−6%	−8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+6%	+12%	+5%	+5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−2%	−6%	−6%	−9%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−3%	−6%	−2%	−10%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−21%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	+5%	−6%	−14%	+15%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−1%	+2%	−1%	+14%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	4,270	13,321	56,911	4,272	13.3	75.0	42.5	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	4,909	15,324	60,415	4,776	12.6	81.3	46.0	–
2023	not published	4,405	13,751	57,378	4,776	12.0	76.8	43.6	–
2022	not published	4,756	14,848	60,979	4,871	12.5	78.0	47.7	–
2021	not published	5,002	15,609	61,996	4,842	12.8	80.7	53.0	–
2020	not published	6,177	19,260	78,336	6,193	12.6	78.8	50.1	–
2019	not published	6,821	21,267	90,813	6,476	14.0	75.1	43.6	–
2018	not published	6,933	21,613	91,656	6,706	13.7	75.6	38.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	42.5	16.3	+161%	1,923 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	46.0	17.5	+163%	1,700 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	43.6	19.4	+125%	1,591 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	47.7	19.1	+149%	1,577 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	53.0	17.9	+196%	1,631 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	50.1	17.6	+185%	1,601 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	43.6	18.9	+131%	1,475 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	38.2	20.2	+89%	1,313 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.