Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HESTIA LEADER

IMO: 9355226
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,940 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,033 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.7

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

75.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (+34%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,145 t

CO₂ emitted

6,771 t

Distance sailed

22,196 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,454 h

61 days, 17% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−2%)

79.6Ranks 232 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.4 (−9%)

12.0Faster than 21% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 106 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+91%)

34.7Ranks 421 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

66 t

1.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HESTIA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HESTIA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HESTIA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	−6%	−22%	−37%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	−23%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−7%	−3%	−15%	+67%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+459%	−49%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2021	+0.2 kn	+11%	+13%	−87%	+69%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−11%	−19%	+132%	−9%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,070	3,397	10,901	835	13.1	98.2	106	–
2024Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,793	5,527	17,199	1,096	15.7	104	–	–
2023	not published	2,145	6,771	22,196	1,454	15.3	96.7	75.6	–
2022	not published	2,725	8,625	26,166	1,792	14.6	104	45.3	–
2021	not published	495	1,570	4,677	324	14.4	106	89.0	–
2019	not published	3,511	10,988	36,745	2,588	14.2	95.5	52.8	–
2018	not published	1,703	5,327	15,854	1,018	15.6	107	57.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	106	55.4	+91%	421 of 506	ClassNK	B+C
2024Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	75.6	56.6	+34%	325 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	45.3	57.7	−21%	103 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	89.0	59.6	+49%	367 of 459	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	52.8	59.0	−11%	147 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	57.9	62.4	−7%	170 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.