Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NORDIC KYLIE

IMO
9357999
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 24.39 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
JULE, BBC YUKON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Kylie GmbH & Co. KG

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
55.5 kg/nm
General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+57%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
32.24
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+27%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (+40%)
Fuel per day at sea
17.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,437 t
CO₂ emitted
4,518 t
4,589 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
25,907 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,989 h
83 days, 23% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.5 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+57%)
17.4Ranks 1,954 of 2,706, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 9.3 (+40%)
7.0Faster than 96% of general cargo ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 32.24 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+27%)
10.14Ranks 1,905 of 2,706, lowest first52.37
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU2%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,592 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • NORDIC KYLIE
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDIC KYLIE
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • NORDIC KYLIE
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.5 kn−9%−5%+116%+20%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.3 kn−0%−3%−66%–0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023–––––
2021→2022–––––
2020→2021+1.5 kn−20%−9%−46%+203%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−4.5 kn+33%−6%+44%+12%4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+8.0 kn−23%+60%−25%−2%8.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Nordic Kylie GmbH & Co. KG1,4374,51825,9071,98913.055.5––
2024Nordic Kylie GmbH & Co. KG7322,28912,01195812.561.0––
2023not published2,1356,72934,9642,73112.861.190.50–
2022not published00–0––––
2021not published6902,15112,02197012.457.4––
2020not published1,5835,00022,0592,01910.971.8––
2019not published8252,57915,28799315.454.072.05–
2018not published1,4344,49520,5192,7707.469.942.03–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Nordic Kylie GmbH & Co. KG32.2425.45+27%1,905 of 2,706Swiss ClimateB+C
2024Nordic Kylie GmbH & Co. KG26.7719.25+39%829 of 1,111Swiss ClimateC
2023not published––––Swiss ClimateA
2022not published––––Swiss Climate–
2021not published97.6922.70+330%1,125 of 1,142Swiss ClimateA
2020not published32.2324.50+32%853 of 1,167Swiss ClimateA
2019not published28.8724.96+16%711 of 1,154RINAA
2018not published29.3824.89+18%663 of 1,044RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

NORDIC KYLIE (IMO 9357999): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze