Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL SHEEHANIYA

IMO: 9360831
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.12 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

348

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

21.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+103%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

134.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,035 t

CO₂ emitted

31,671 t

Distance sailed

28,852 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,796 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 311 kg/nm · median 190 (+63%)

152Ranks 339 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

11.2Faster than 79% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+73%)

5.06Ranks 329 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU61%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

3,653 t

36% of all fuel; 64% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

732 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL SHEEHANIYA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AL SHEEHANIYA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL SHEEHANIYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.3 kn	−13%	−11%	+19%	+13%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+3%	−4%	−6%	−48%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	−1%	+14%	+4%	+134%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.3 kn	+8%	−13%	−25%	−19%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.3 kn	−10%	+31%	−34%	−4%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	+11%	−13%	−1%	+16%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	10,000	30,811	32,198	2,101	15.3	311	–	–
2023	not published	9,661	30,452	27,028	1,805	15.0	357	–	49%
2022	not published	10,035	31,671	28,852	1,796	16.1	348	–	36%
2021	not published	9,732	30,763	27,676	1,991	13.9	352	–	–
2020	not published	12,039	37,963	36,856	2,139	17.2	327	–	–
2019	not published	20,323	63,506	56,107	4,714	11.9	362	–	100%
2018	not published	18,549	58,004	56,606	3,751	15.1	328	–	53%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	12.4	7.12	+73%	329 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	11.0	9.10	+21%	240 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	21.1	10.4	+103%	327 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	9.00	10.5	−14%	116 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.2	10.7	+4%	151 of 267	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.6	10.9	+7%	139 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	10.0	10.9	−8%	70 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.