Navalyze · Container · Ship

ADMIRAL STAR

IMO: 9360972
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,717 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: DANCE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,717 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

80.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.07

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+177%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

201 t

CO₂ emitted

643 t

653 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,496 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

218 h

9 days, 2% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 80.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 245 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+177%)

7.22Ranks 1,963 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU68%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ADMIRAL STAR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ADMIRAL STAR
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ADMIRAL STAR
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	−11%	−26%	−8%	−60%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.6 kn	+27%	+22%	−92%	+48%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.7 kn	−14%	+17%	−16%	+64%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+0%	−10%	−34%	−27%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	−9%	+18%	+8%	+8%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	+1%	+58%	+52%	−4%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	201	643	2,496	218	11.4	80.4	45.07	–
2025	ALBASHIPS DENIZCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI	201	643	2,496	218	11.4	80.4	45.07	–
2024	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	245	764	2,723	197	13.8	90.0	114.05	–
2022	not published	2,426	7,560	34,224	2,371	14.4	70.9	76.85	–
2021	not published	3,363	10,512	40,837	3,817	10.7	82.4	46.81	–
2020	not published	5,070	15,905	61,675	5,184	11.9	82.2	64.41	–
2019	not published	5,143	16,089	57,176	6,202	9.2	89.9	59.63	–
2018	not published	3,327	10,525	37,530	6,348	5.9	88.7	61.96	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	ALBASHIPS DENIZCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI	45.07	16.30	+177%	1,963 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	114.05	17.52	+551%	1,966 of 1,974	DNV	A
2022	not published	76.85	19.13	+302%	1,789 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	46.81	17.90	+162%	1,560 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	64.41	17.58	+266%	1,716 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	59.63	18.88	+216%	1,650 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	61.96	20.22	+206%	1,587 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.