Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

EXPRESS

IMO: 9361445
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerp
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

517

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10,647

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

5.1 kn

Fuel per day at sea

63.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,173 t

CO₂ emitted

15,015 t

Distance sailed

10,007 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,964 h

82 days, 22% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2018

Set against all 197 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 481 kg/nm · median 323 (+49%)

221Ranks 188 of 197, lowest first437

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.7 (+0%)

10.0Faster than 51% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 14.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.9 (+28%)

5.83Ranks 152 of 197, lowest first18.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU75%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

149 t

1.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EXPRESS
LNG carrier median

300.0350.0400.0450.0500.0550.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

EXPRESS
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−8.6 kn	+8%	−60%	+0%	–	8.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,173	15,015	10,007	1,964	5.1	517	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	4,793	13,357	9,968	726	13.7	481	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	14.0	10.9	+28%	152 of 197	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.