Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SDS RED

IMO: 9365518
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,567 t
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MANISA TECH S.R.L.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

44.2 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

27.86

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+9%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,651 t

CO₂ emitted

5,275 t

5,356 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,317 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,959 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 44.2 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+25%)

17.4Ranks 1,724 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 9.3 (+1%)

7.0Faster than 52% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.86 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+9%)

10.14Ranks 1,569 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU14%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU7%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,407 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SDS RED
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SDS RED
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SDS RED
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−3%	−12%	+6%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−4%	+3%	+38%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	−28%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+13%	+9%	−1%	+18%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	−3%	+23%	+21%	+31%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	−19%	−47%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	−2%	+41%	+9%	−21%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MANISA TECH S.R.L.	1,651	5,275	37,317	3,959	9.4	44.2	30.95	–
2024	MANISA TECH S.R.L.	1,619	5,068	35,362	3,420	10.3	45.8	34.43	–
2023	not published	1,214	3,805	25,571	2,620	9.8	47.5	31.30	–
2022	not published	1,729	5,411	35,291	3,711	9.5	49.0	30.48	–
2021	not published	1,559	4,875	35,805	3,637	9.8	43.5	29.82	–
2020	not published	1,330	4,218	29,698	3,795	7.8	44.8	26.66	–
2019	not published	1,728	5,403	36,631	4,635	7.9	47.2	32.49	–
2018	not published	1,621	5,066	33,590	6,198	5.4	48.2	35.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MANISA TECH S.R.L.	27.86	25.45	+9%	1,569 of 2,706	RINA	B
2024	MANISA TECH S.R.L.	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2023	not published	23.34	20.67	+13%	633 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	22.85	21.57	+6%	556 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	19.43	22.70	−14%	411 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	14.86	24.50	−39%	186 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	28.27	24.96	+13%	695 of 1,154	RINA	–
2018	not published	35.66	24.89	+43%	779 of 1,044	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.