Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ESL AUSTRALIA

IMO: 9365661
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seramare Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

72.1 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+104%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.56

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−3%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+31%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,352 t

CO₂ emitted

7,387 t

7,503 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,610 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,677 h

112 days, 31% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 72.1 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+104%)

17.4Ranks 2,308 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 9.3 (+31%)

7.0Faster than 91% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.56 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−3%)

10.14Ranks 1,253 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU40%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,498 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ESL AUSTRALIA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ESL AUSTRALIA
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ESL AUSTRALIA
General cargo median

15.017.520.022.525.027.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+5%	+5%	−21%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	+22%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−8%	−5%	+8%	+1%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+7%	+2%	−12%	+17%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	−25%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−8%	+7%	+1%	+13%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+4%	−2%	+26%	−15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Seramare Shipping Company Limited	2,352	7,387	32,610	2,677	12.2	72.1	–	–
2024	Seramare Shipping Company Limited	2,837	8,886	41,487	3,383	12.3	68.4	–	–
2023	not published	2,262	7,113	33,969	2,772	12.3	66.6	–	–
2022	not published	2,270	7,182	31,397	2,627	12.0	72.3	–	–
2021	not published	2,411	7,635	35,566	2,867	12.4	67.8	–	–
2020	not published	3,127	9,917	47,149	3,702	12.7	66.3	–	–
2019	not published	3,344	10,521	46,542	4,220	11.0	71.9	–	–
2018	not published	2,560	8,065	37,002	3,174	11.7	69.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seramare Shipping Company Limited	24.56	25.45	−3%	1,253 of 2,706	DNV	B
2024	Seramare Shipping Company Limited	18.45	19.25	−4%	520 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	20.64	20.67	−0%	523 of 1,045	DNV	B
2022	not published	20.36	21.57	−6%	464 of 1,034	DNV	B
2021	not published	17.44	22.70	−23%	316 of 1,142	DNV	B
2020	not published	22.54	24.50	−8%	490 of 1,167	DNV	B
2019	not published	19.87	24.96	−20%	347 of 1,154	DNV	B
2018	not published	23.38	24.89	−6%	464 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.