Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC VAN EYCK

IMO: 9365984
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,077 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ARA LIVERPOOL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,614 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.3

Container median 182 kg/nm (−62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

60.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+199%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,092 t

CO₂ emitted

16,062 t

Distance sailed

73,461 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,849 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−61%)

78.8Ranks 104 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+225%)

7.22Ranks 2,058 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

792 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WEC VAN EYCK
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC VAN EYCK
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC VAN EYCK
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−5%	−18%	+9%	−12%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−2%	−10%	−35%	−1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	+7%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+4%	+2%	−15%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+1.3 kn	+3%	+14%	+18%	+6%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−2%	−9%	−6%	−6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,625	11,323	52,467	5,335	9.8	69.1	52.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,520	11,039	48,246	4,243	11.4	73.0	60.0	–
2023	not published	5,508	16,574	73,803	5,955	12.4	74.6	60.8	–
2022	not published	5,051	16,083	69,289	5,449	12.7	72.9	51.2	–
2021	not published	5,719	18,148	81,645	6,332	12.9	70.0	60.5	–
2019	not published	4,729	14,930	69,296	5,970	11.6	68.2	56.9	–
2018	not published	5,092	16,062	73,461	5,849	12.6	69.3	60.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	52.9	16.3	+225%	2,058 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	60.0	17.5	+242%	1,856 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	60.8	19.4	+213%	1,791 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	51.2	19.1	+168%	1,628 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	60.5	17.9	+238%	1,679 of 1,781	DNV	C
2019	not published	56.9	18.9	+201%	1,625 of 1,788	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	60.5	20.2	+199%	1,579 of 1,705	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.