Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BW PARIS

IMO: 9368302
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

264

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.59

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−21%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,931 t

CO₂ emitted

27,769 t

Distance sailed

37,603 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,451 h

102 days, 28% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 289 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 277 kg/nm · median 257 (+8%)

171Ranks 166 of 289, lowest first378

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.6 (+3%)

11.4Faster than 59% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.51 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.5 (−9%)

5.77Ranks 128 of 289, lowest first20.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

458 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BW PARIS
LNG carrier median

240.0260.0280.0300.0320.0340.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

BW PARIS
LNG carrier median

13.514.014.515.015.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BW PARIS
LNG carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+12%	+21%	+224%	+3%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−6%	−15%	−69%	+8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−8%	−3%	+22%	−23%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,621	29,283	38,324	2,530	15.1	277	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,939	8,096	11,833	849	13.9	248	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	9,931	27,769	37,603	2,451	15.3	264	–	–
2018	not published	8,862	26,233	30,753	2,115	14.5	288	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.51	10.5	−9%	128 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.24	10.7	−14%	91 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.59	10.9	−21%	63 of 248	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	11.2	10.9	+2%	105 of 197	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.