Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

HAPPY CONDOR

IMO: 9368780
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,510 t
Port of registry: KØBenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,510 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.5 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

171

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+380%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,010 t

CO₂ emitted

6,357 t

6,455 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,645 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,863 h

78 days, 21% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.5 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+0%)

49.8Ranks 179 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 12.6 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 60% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 170.77 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+380%)

14.36Ranks 339 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU32%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU5%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,331 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HAPPY CONDOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAPPY CONDOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAPPY CONDOR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.050.0100150200250

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.1 kn	+29%	+53%	−54%	+50%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	−10%	+22%	+70%	−44%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.1 kn	−1%	+35%	−23%	+169%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	+8%	−26%	−15%	+24%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.1 kn	−25%	+42%	+54%	−61%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.6 kn	+36%	−23%	+93%	−23%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	2,010	6,357	24,645	1,863	13.2	81.5	170.77	–
2024	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	3,395	10,685	53,762	4,833	11.1	63.1	113.60	–
2023	not published	2,215	6,969	31,612	3,838	8.2	70.1	202.77	–
2022	not published	2,898	9,197	41,020	6,768	6.1	70.7	75.41	–
2021	not published	3,146	9,962	47,993	5,423	8.8	65.5	60.63	100%
2020	not published	2,729	8,748	31,110	6,651	4.7	87.7	154.88	–
2019	not published	1,037	3,268	16,095	1,943	8.3	64.4	202.40	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	170.77	35.56	+380%	339 of 355	Verifavia	B+C
2024	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	113.60	35.82	+217%	272 of 306	Verifavia	B+C
2023	not published	202.77	41.77	+385%	320 of 330	Verifavia	B+C
2022	not published	75.41	42.53	+77%	252 of 348	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	60.63	46.91	+29%	200 of 323	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	154.88	42.29	+266%	322 of 339	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	202.40	45.85	+341%	324 of 331	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.