Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH MANILA

IMO: 9368912
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,627 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.57 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,039 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.4

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

66.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (+17%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,626 t

CO₂ emitted

17,646 t

Distance sailed

65,893 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,776 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.5 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−14%)

79.6Ranks 81 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

12.0Faster than 44% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 73.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+34%)

34.7Ranks 342 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU9%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

849 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH MANILA
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH MANILA
Vehicle carrier median

12.513.013.514.014.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH MANILA
Vehicle carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−7%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+2%	+5%	+3%	+15%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−12%	−13%	+27%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−2%	−0%	+37%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+14%	+24%	+83%	+16%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−4%	−13%	−57%	+1%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+3%	+7%	+61%	+0%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	5,392	16,908	63,046	4,462	14.1	85.5	73.9	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	5,921	18,571	68,024	4,768	14.3	87.0	76.3	–
2023	not published	5,626	17,646	65,893	4,776	13.8	85.4	66.3	–
2022	not published	5,079	15,938	52,055	3,756	13.9	97.6	72.7	–
2021	not published	3,779	11,831	38,115	2,781	13.7	99.1	90.2	–
2020	not published	1,800	5,645	20,796	1,642	12.7	86.6	77.7	–
2019	not published	4,365	13,680	48,268	3,482	13.9	90.4	76.6	–
2018	not published	2,647	8,295	30,049	2,262	13.3	88.1	76.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	73.9	55.4	+34%	342 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	76.3	55.3	+38%	244 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	66.3	56.6	+17%	281 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	72.7	57.7	+26%	319 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	90.2	59.6	+51%	370 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	77.7	57.3	+36%	331 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	76.6	59.0	+30%	313 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	76.4	62.4	+23%	294 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.