Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BEAUTRIDENT

IMO: 9369306
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Luxembourg
Port of registry: Luxembourg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BEAUTROPHY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

33.7

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

21.3

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (−6%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

959 t

CO₂ emitted

3,075 t

Distance sailed

28,500 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,557 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 34.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−3%)

17.4Ranks 1,334 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 9.3 (+2%)

6.9Faster than 55% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−26%)

10.2Ranks 705 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU73%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

58 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BEAUTRIDENT
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BEAUTRIDENT
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BEAUTRIDENT
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−1%	−5%	+47%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	−21%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+2%	−5%	−45%	−55%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+1%	−4%	+54%	+213%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−10%	−14%	+335%	−86%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−6%	+40%	−66%	+191%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+13%	+4%	−32%	+192%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	954	3,059	27,864	2,918	9.5	34.2	–	–
2024	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	655	2,088	18,936	1,922	9.9	34.6	–	–
2023	not published	838	2,687	24,005	2,450	9.8	34.9	–	–
2022	not published	1,500	4,809	43,990	4,206	10.5	34.1	–	–
2021	not published	959	3,075	28,500	2,557	11.1	33.7	–	–
2020	not published	245	777	6,556	561	11.7	37.4	–	–
2019	not published	771	2,434	19,479	2,483	7.8	39.6	–	–
2018	not published	995	3,113	28,468	3,319	8.6	34.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	18.8	25.5	−26%	705 of 2,723	DNV	B
2024	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	20.8	19.3	+8%	622 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	29.7	20.7	+44%	817 of 1,045	DNV	B
2022	not published	66.7	21.6	+209%	985 of 1,034	DNV	B
2021	not published	21.3	22.7	−6%	501 of 1,142	DNV	B
2020	not published	150	24.5	+513%	1,156 of 1,167	DNV	B
2019	not published	51.6	25.0	+107%	1,020 of 1,154	DNV	B
2018	not published	17.7	24.9	−29%	250 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.