Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC BREMEN

IMO: 9369734
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 39,812 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.15 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,444 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

207

Container median 174 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+10%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,802 t

CO₂ emitted

52,797 t

Distance sailed

81,154 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,168 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 177 (+30%)

78.8Ranks 1,486 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 17.9 kn · median 13.3 (+35%)

9.1Faster than 99% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+11%)

7.22Ranks 1,221 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU43%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,802 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

829 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC BREMEN
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BREMEN
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BREMEN
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+23%	+37%	−38%	+27%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.5 kn	+22%	+44%	−14%	−15%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2023	−3.5 kn	−30%	−44%	−56%	−14%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+6%	+16%	−59%	−6%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	−10%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,806	5,629	7,846	438	17.9	230	18.0	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,379	7,412	12,665	788	16.1	188	14.2	–
2023	not published	2,273	7,144	14,701	1,080	13.6	155	16.8	–
2020	not published	7,333	23,181	33,325	1,953	17.1	220	19.4	100%
2019	not published	16,802	52,797	81,154	5,168	15.7	207	20.7	100%
2018	not published	19,195	60,195	90,188	5,802	15.5	213	18.6	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	18.0	16.3	+11%	1,221 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14.2	17.5	−19%	772 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	16.8	19.4	−14%	815 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	19.4	17.6	+10%	992 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.7	18.9	+10%	992 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	18.6	20.2	−8%	760 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.