Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

V PEGASUS

IMO: 9370422
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ASSAY, ELEGANT EMILIE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DALIAN CHUN AN SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

71.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+103%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

8.58

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−66%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

847 t

CO₂ emitted

2,651 t

2,693 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,828 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,141 h

48 days, 13% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 71.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+103%)

17.4Ranks 2,292 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 9.3 (+12%)

7.0Faster than 70% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 8.58 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−66%)

10.14Ranks 168 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU33%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,391 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

V PEGASUS
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

V PEGASUS
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

V PEGASUS
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+3%	+14%	−45%	−12%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.6 kn	+20%	−14%	+741%	+60%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.5 kn	−20%	+23%	−71%	–	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−2%	−23%	−37%	–	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+17%	+12%	−41%	−27%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	−21%	+74%	+233%	+35%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DALIAN CHUN AN SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	847	2,651	11,828	1,141	10.4	71.6	–	–
2024part-year	Tamar Ship Management Pte Ltd	1,213	3,802	17,449	1,892	9.2	69.5	9.05	–
2024	DALIAN CHUN AN SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	1,504	4,712	21,637	2,308	9.4	69.5	11.21	–
2023	not published	149	465	2,572	198	13.0	58.1	–	–
2022	not published	651	2,049	8,983	1,063	8.5	72.4	18.37	–
2021	not published	1,057	3,341	14,309	1,324	10.8	73.9	10.96	–
2020	not published	1,544	4,853	24,407	2,162	11.3	63.2	15.02	–
2019	not published	587	1,849	7,337	1,436	5.1	80.0	11.09	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DALIAN CHUN AN SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	8.58	25.45	−66%	168 of 2,706	ClassNK	A
2024part-year	Tamar Ship Management Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024	DALIAN CHUN AN SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.	9.79	19.25	−49%	232 of 1,111	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	6.10	20.67	−70%	32 of 1,045	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	10.96	8.57	+28%	2,534 of 3,466	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	15.02	8.24	+82%	2,857 of 3,150	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	11.09	8.38	+32%	2,510 of 3,360	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.