Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL GHUWAIRIYA

IMO
9372743
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.70 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
398
LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
9.58
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−12%)
Average speed
14.5 kn
LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+7%)
Fuel per day at sea
138.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,898 t
CO₂ emitted
43,313 t
Distance sailed
34,968 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,414 h
101 days, 28% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 267 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 388 kg/nm · median 297 (+31%)
202Ranks 235 of 267, lowest first397
Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 14.7 (+13%)
11.8Faster than 88% of LNG carrier ships16.7
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.51 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.7 (−11%)
6.68Ranks 101 of 267, lowest first18.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
13,898 t
100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,243 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AL GHUWAIRIYA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AL GHUWAIRIYA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AL GHUWAIRIYA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+2.1 kn−2%+12%−39%−1%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published8,32826,25821,4641,29716.6388––
2019not published13,89843,31334,9682,41414.5398–100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2020not published9.5110.7−11%101 of 267ABSC
2019not published9.5810.9−12%83 of 248ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.