Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SUPERSPEED 1

IMO: 9374519
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Kristiansand
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Color Line Marine AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

233

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

350

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

634

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+171%)

Average speed

21.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+36%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,388 t

CO₂ emitted

67,860 t

Distance sailed

96,176 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,421 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 224 kg/nm · median 150 (+49%)

69.3Ranks 358 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 21.7 kn · median 15.8 (+37%)

12.0Faster than 88% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 588 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+4%)

66.8Ranks 208 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 817 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+223%)

48.6Ranks 323 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,058 t

6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUPERSPEED 1
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUPERSPEED 1
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SUPERSPEED 1
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SUPERSPEED 1
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,0002,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−0%	+0%	+1%	+48%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−3%	−4%	+1%	+13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	−4%	−22%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+4%	+7%	+33%	−37%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−5%	−8%	+2%	−67%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	−27%	+193%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	−1%	+8%	+4%	+2%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Color Line Marine AS	21,965	68,296	98,043	4,528	21.7	224	–	–
2024	Color Line Marine AS	21,844	68,187	97,058	4,514	21.5	225	–	–
2023	not published	22,388	67,860	96,176	4,421	21.8	233	–	–
2022	not published	24,828	77,679	100,026	4,432	22.6	248	–	–
2021	not published	17,946	56,191	75,117	3,437	21.9	239	–	–
2020	not published	18,528	57,999	73,358	3,250	22.6	253	–	–
2019	not published	25,412	79,538	100,900	4,426	22.8	252	–	–
2018	not published	24,542	76,793	96,742	4,633	20.9	254	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Color Line Marine AS	588	567	+4%	208 of 408	817	253	+223%	DNV	B+C
2024	Color Line Marine AS	397	547	−27%	168 of 404	851	233	+266%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	350	680	−49%	120 of 386	634	234	+171%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	451	626	−28%	162 of 394	658	253	+160%	DNV	C
2021	not published	719	815	−12%	175 of 377	41.5	226	−82%	DNV	C
2020	not published	2,178	751	+190%	340 of 387	107	217	−51%	DNV	C
2019	not published	744	569	+31%	230 of 394	223	223	+0%	DNV	A
2018	not published	729	729	+0%	181 of 361	217	184	+18%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.