Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SOLENT

IMO: 9375953
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,029 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEASTAR TRADER, CAGLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SEALIFE DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,058 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.5

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+14%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,553 t

CO₂ emitted

8,100 t

Distance sailed

38,983 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,588 h

150 days, 41% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−29%)

61.0Ranks 264 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 76% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.77 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+11%)

4.80Ranks 2,195 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU30%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

810 t

10.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SOLENT
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SOLENT
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SOLENT
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+27%	+46%	−61%	−72%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−47%	−49%	+172%	+54%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+19%	+10%	−33%	+79%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−7.8 kn	−1%	−43%	−20%	−10%	7.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+7.8 kn	+13%	+95%	−38%	+32%	7.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−11%	+6%	+15%	−9%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+4%	−1%	+106%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SEALIFE DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	803	2,536	13,749	1,217	11.3	58.4	8.77	–
2024	SEALIFE DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	1,618	5,082	35,211	3,611	9.8	46.0	30.9	–
2023	not published	1,134	3,586	12,966	1,292	10.0	87.4	20.0	–
2022	not published	1,425	4,460	19,461	1,789	10.9	73.2	11.2	–
2021	not published	1,804	5,699	24,285	1,301	18.7	74.3	12.4	–
2020	not published	2,553	8,100	38,983	3,588	10.9	65.5	9.42	–
2019	not published	2,501	7,869	33,959	3,719	9.1	73.6	10.4	–
2018	not published	1,164	3,672	16,466	1,719	9.6	70.7	9,487,881	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SEALIFE DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	8.77	7.90	+11%	2,195 of 3,611	Verifavia	B
2024	SEALIFE DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	30.9	8.09	+282%	3,036 of 3,089	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	20.0	8.27	+142%	3,285 of 3,548	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	11.2	8.71	+28%	2,825 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	12.4	8.57	+45%	2,821 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	9.42	8.24	+14%	2,003 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	10.4	8.38	+24%	2,342 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.