Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ADVANTAGE VALUE

IMO: 9376749
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 195,432 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: GENEL DENIZCILIK NAKLIYATI A.S

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 195,432 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

211.5 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (+64%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

3.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (−58%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,222 t

CO₂ emitted

22,551 t

22,905 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,139 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,975 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 211.5 kg/nm · median 129.0 (+64%)

79.5Ranks 1,682 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 10.9 (+6%)

8.1Faster than 68% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (−58%)

4.44Ranks 59 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU23%
Into the EU73%
At berth in the EU4%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,762 t).

Fuel burned laden

73%

27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ADVANTAGE VALUE
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ADVANTAGE VALUE
Oil tanker median

10.511.011.512.012.5

’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ADVANTAGE VALUE
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−16%	−22%	+83%	−51%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	GENEL DENIZCILIK NAKLIYATI A.S	7,222	22,551	34,139	2,975	11.5	211.5	3.38	73%
2023	not published	4,678	14,784	18,629	1,500	12.4	251.1	6.84	44%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	GENEL DENIZCILIK NAKLIYATI A.S	3.38	8.06	−58%	59 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	6.84	8.44	−19%	609 of 1,797	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.