Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

TIJUCA

IMO: 9377511
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,597 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TØNsberg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WILHELMSEN LINES SHIPOWNING MALTA LIMITED · part of Wallenius Wilhelmsen

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,525 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

148

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (−13%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

53.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,195 t

CO₂ emitted

16,268 t

Distance sailed

35,209 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,328 h

97 days, 27% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+10%)

79.6Ranks 398 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 14.4 (+4%)

12.0Faster than 67% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−28%)

34.7Ranks 100 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU42%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

462 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIJUCA
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIJUCA
Vehicle carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIJUCA
Vehicle carrier median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.9 kn	−7%	+26%	+95%	−80%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	−14%	−31%	−75%	+202%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.7 kn	−11%	+34%	+145%	−39%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.4 kn	+15%	−22%	−58%	+68%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+1%	+10%	+3%	+9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.8 kn	−2%	−21%	−32%	−12%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+2%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	WILHELMSEN LINES SHIPOWNING MALTA LIMITED	1,375	4,329	12,549	837	15.0	110	40.1	–
2024	WILHELMSEN LINES SHIPOWNING MALTA LIMITED	757	2,390	6,425	580	11.1	118	200	–
2023	not published	3,581	11,343	26,024	1,890	13.8	138	66.2	–
2022	not published	1,644	5,218	10,618	1,162	9.1	155	109	–
2021	not published	3,356	10,622	24,996	1,849	13.5	134	64.8	–
2020	not published	3,254	10,226	24,379	1,969	12.4	134	59.6	–
2019	not published	4,898	15,334	35,828	2,353	15.2	137	67.7	–
2018	not published	5,195	16,268	35,209	2,328	15.1	148	54.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	WILHELMSEN LINES SHIPOWNING MALTA LIMITED	40.1	55.4	−28%	100 of 506	DNV	A+C
2024	WILHELMSEN LINES SHIPOWNING MALTA LIMITED	200	55.3	+261%	315 of 335	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	66.2	56.6	+17%	279 of 417	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	109	57.7	+89%	408 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	64.8	59.6	+9%	268 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	59.6	57.3	+4%	244 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	67.7	59.0	+15%	279 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	54.2	62.4	−13%	121 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.