Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BHG FORTUNE

IMO: 9377846
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Momrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 15.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HC OPAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: 'HC Anna-Lena' Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

50.4 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

9,527

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

12.1 kn

Fuel per day at sea

14.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

585 t

CO₂ emitted

1,840 t

1,869 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,614 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

960 h

40 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 57.2 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−3%)

34.9Ranks 528 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 10.5 (+12%)

7.8Faster than 80% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.92 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+61%)

7.51Ranks 920 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU59%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU0%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BHG FORTUNE
General cargo median

50.055.060.065.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BHG FORTUNE
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BHG FORTUNE
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−12%	−10%	−10%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+5%	−2%	+46%	−6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	−76%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−0%	−8%	+24%	+37%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	+11%	−9%	−4%	+5%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.3 kn	−19%	+33%	+38%	–	6.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+8%	−8%	−51%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	'HC Anna-Lena' Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	585	1,840	11,614	960	12.1	50.4	–	–
2025	XIAMEN XINGJIAYU SHIPPING CO.,LTD	585	1,840	11,614	960	12.1	50.4	–	–
2024	'HC Anna-Lena' Schifffahrts GmbH & Co KG	737	2,306	12,882	1,092	11.8	57.2	65.95	–
2023	not published	484	1,516	8,837	702	12.6	54.7	–	–
2022	not published	2,080	6,533	37,549	3,063	12.3	55.4	–	74%
2021	not published	1,686	5,286	30,350	2,279	13.3	55.6	–	82%
2020	not published	1,574	4,932	31,454	1,942	16.2	50.0	–	–
2019	not published	1,415	4,428	22,818	2,303	9.9	62.0	28.97	–
2018	not published	2,637	8,279	46,133	3,986	11.6	57.2	30.40	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	'HC Anna-Lena' Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2025	XIAMEN XINGJIAYU SHIPPING CO.,LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	'HC Anna-Lena' Schifffahrts GmbH & Co KG	30.92	19.25	+61%	920 of 1,111	RINA	–
2023	not published	32.91	20.67	+59%	877 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	25.51	21.57	+18%	650 of 1,034	ABS	B
2021	not published	18.61	22.70	−18%	373 of 1,142	ABS	B
2020	not published	17.73	24.50	−28%	268 of 1,167	ABS	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.